Why "We Are All One Race" Is Actually Hurting Our Unity
Updated: Oct 14
We've all heard the phrase, "There's only one race, the human race."
And let's be honest, it usually comes from a good place. It’s a sentiment meant to bring us together and highlight our shared humanity, and that can be a beautiful thing. It often reflects a deep desire for a world without division, where we finally see each other as equals.
But have you ever considered that for many of our black brothers and sisters, those well-meaning words can feel like a dismissal of their reality? What if the path to biblical unity doesn’t come from ignoring our differences, but from seeing them, honoring them, and understanding them?

The Problem of a "Good" Idea
The phrase "we're all one race," or its cousin, "I don't see color," became popular for a good reason. In a world scarred by the evils of racism, it felt like a step forward. It was a way of saying, "I refuse to participate in the bigotry of the past. I'll judge people by their character, not their skin color." And that is a righteous desire.
The intention is unity. The goal is to lay down the historical weapons of division. But there’s a problem that many of us, especially those of us who are white, have been slow to see. While the intention may be to create a level playing field, the impact can sometimes be the exact opposite. When "we're all one human race" is said in response to conversations about injustice and unity, it can shut those conversations down. It can unintentionally signal that we’re not comfortable talking about the specifics of injustice or unity related to ethnic distinctions.
It can be a subtle way of saying, "Let's not get into the messy details of what it’s like to be Black in America. Let's just focus on what we have in common." But this approach — often called colorblindness — can create a false sense of peace. This kind of peace may prioritize the comfort of the majority over the painful reality of a minority. Research distinguishes between different types of colorblind ideology, such as "color-evasion," which minimizes racial categories, and "power-evasion," which denies that racism has a real impact. While some people use the phrase to simply express a belief in equal human worth, others may use it in a way that functions as power-evasion, which implies greater prejudice.
This can create the impression that if we just stop talking about race, then racism will go away. But for many who live with the daily reality of racism — whether it's systemic bias, microaggressions, or historical trauma — being told that race doesn't matter can feel profoundly invalidating. It’s true, but it misses the point entirely and ignores the immediate suffering that's happening.
The hard truth is that while race is a social construct, not a rigid biological category, its effects can be profound. Pretending race doesn’t exist doesn’t heal the wounds of racism; it just hides them.
A Story of Erasure
Let me try to make this more concrete. Imagine a small group at church is sharing prayer requests. A black man named Marcus shares that he's feeling exhausted and anxious. He explains he was pulled over by the police for the third time in six months for something minor, and each time, he felt a wave of fear that was totally out of proportion to the situation. He talks about teaching his son how to interact with law enforcement in a way his white friends never have to think about. He's not accusing anyone; he's just sharing the burden on his heart.
Now, imagine a well-meaning member of the group, wanting to comfort him, says, "Marcus, I'm so sorry you feel that way. But remember, there's no black or white in God's kingdom. We're all one race, the human race. We shouldn't let the world's divisions into the church."
Can you feel that disconnect? The person who responded had a good heart. They wanted to offer a theological truth to bring comfort. But what was the effect?
Marcus' specific pain, tied to his experience as a black man, was just dismissed. The conversation was pivoted from his lived reality to an abstract principle. He was implicitly told that his racialized experience wasn't a valid concern for the body of Christ. The focus became "our unity" in the abstract, rather than the concrete suffering of a member of the body.
This is an example of the erasure we're talking about. It’s not necessarily malicious. It’s not hateful. But it can be harmful. It can communicate, “I don’t know how to enter into your specific pain, so let’s talk about something we all share instead.” This leaves the person who is hurting feeling isolated and misunderstood, right in the place they should feel most seen: the family of God.
The Theological Pivot: A Body with Many Parts
So, if a "colorblind" approach isn't the biblical goal, what is? How do we pursue true unity without erasing the very real, and sometimes painful, differences in our experiences?
Thankfully, the Apostle Paul gives us a powerful framework for this, and he lays it out in 1 Corinthians, chapter 12. Far from being an abstract teaching, Paul is directly addressing the real-world divisions in the Corinthian church — divisions of status and ethnicity. In verse 13, he makes this explicit: "For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body — Jews or Greeks, slaves or free — and all were made to drink of one Spirit." Paul is tackling the social and ethnic barriers of his day head-on.
He then uses the analogy of a human body to describe how this unity-in-diversity works. He says the body isn’t one part, but many. You have a hand, a foot, an eye, an ear. Each is different and has a unique function. The health of the whole body depends on every single part being valued.
Paul writes, "The eye cannot say to the hand, 'I have no need of you,' nor again the head to the feet, 'I have no need of you.'"
Think about that. The eye and the hand have totally different experiences. The hand feels texture and temperature. The eye sees light and color. For the eye to tell the hand, "Your experience of texture doesn't matter, all that matters is we're in the same body," would be absurd. The body needs the hand's unique experience.
Paul then goes even deeper. He says the parts of the body that seem "weaker" or "less honorable" should be treated with "special honor." If a part of the body is more vulnerable, the rest of the body doesn't ignore it; it gives it more attention and protection.
This is the opposite of an approach that flattens all distinction. This is a theology that sees, honors, and cares for our differences. It understands that unity is not uniformity.
The Solution: Empathy Over Erasure
And this brings us to the verse that should reshape our approach. In 1 Corinthians 12:26, Paul gives the conclusion to his analogy: "If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it."
This is the heart of true Christian empathy.
Notice what it doesn't say. It doesn't say, "If one part suffers, the others should remind it that we're all one body, so its suffering isn't a big deal." No. It says we suffer with it.
When your foot is in agony because you stepped on a nail, your mouth doesn't say, "Stop complaining, foot, we're all part of the same body, and the rest of the body is fine." Your mouth cries out! Your hands go to help. The entire body participates in the suffering of that one part.
Applying this principle to racial experiences is transformative. If our brothers and sisters in Christ — who are fellow members of the one body — are telling us that they are suffering from the specific pains of racism, the biblical response is not to say, "Let's not see color." The biblical response is to stop, to listen, and to let their suffering become our suffering. It is to pay more attention, not less.
This is what biblical unity looks like. It’s a lived, empathetic solidarity. It means choosing to listen seriously to the experiences of others, even when we haven't experienced them ourselves. It means being willing to sit in the discomfort of a painful conversation because we love the person who is in pain.
True unity doesn’t require us to pretend the historical and ongoing realities of racial injustice aren't real. In fact, it requires the opposite. It requires the courage to face that reality together, as one body.
Call to Action
So, how do we put this into practice? It starts in our conversations, by changing our reflexes.
The next time you're in a conversation about race and feel the urge to offer a unifying but potentially dismissive statement like "we're all one race," try to pause. Take a breath. And instead of shutting the conversation down, open it up.
Instead of saying, "I don't see color," try asking, "What has your experience been like?"
Instead of saying, "We just need to focus on Jesus," try, "Help me understand how this is affecting your walk with Jesus."
Instead of ending the discussion, invite testimony. Choose listening over lecturing. Choose empathy over erasure. This is how we bear one another's burdens. This is how we honor every part of the body.
Conclusion
The vision of heaven in the book of Revelation is not a colorless, homogenous group. It's a "great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages" worshiping God. Many read this to mean our diversity isn’t erased in eternity; it's redeemed and brought into the chorus of praise. Our different ethnicities are not a problem to be solved, but a reflection of God's infinite creativity.
Saying "we're all one race, the human race" often comes from a good place. But there is a better, more biblical, more empathetic way. It’s a way that doesn’t demand that our Black brothers and sisters minimize their pain for the sake of a shallow unity. Instead, it invites all of us, as members of one body, to enter into that pain together, to weep with those who weep.
Because only when we are willing to suffer with one another can we truly begin to heal together. And that is the kind of unity that glorifies God and shows a watching world the radical, empathetic, and multi-colored love of Jesus Christ.




Comments